CNPA最新試験 & CNPA再テスト

CNPA準備急流はタイミング機能を高め、内容は理解しやすく、重要な情報を簡素化しました。 CNPAテストブレインダンプは、より重要な情報をより少ない回答と質問で伝え、学習をリラックスして効率的にします。試験に不合格になった場合は、すぐに返金されます。Linux FoundationすべてのCNPA試験トレントは、CNPA試験に簡単かつ正常に合格するために多くの助けを与えます。 CNPA試験問題を試してみてください。どれだけ優れているかがわかります。

Linux Foundation CNPA 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック	出題範囲
トピック 1	Platform APIs and Provisioning Infrastructure: This part of the exam evaluates Procurement Specialists on the use of Kubernetes reconciliation loops, APIs for self-service platforms, and infrastructure provisioning with Kubernetes. It also assesses knowledge of the Kubernetes operator pattern for integration and platform scalability.
トピック 2	IDPs and Developer Experience: This section of the exam measures the skills of Supplier Management Consultants and focuses on improving developer experience. It covers simplified access to platform capabilities, API-driven service catalogs, developer portals for platform adoption, and the role of AI ML in platform automation.
トピック 3	Platform Observability, Security, and Conformance: This part of the exam evaluates Procurement Specialists on key aspects of observability and security. It includes working with traces, metrics, logs, and events while ensuring secure service communication. Policy engines, Kubernetes security essentials, and protection in CI CD pipelines are also assessed here.
トピック 4	Continuous Delivery & Platform Engineering: This section measures the skills of Supplier Management Consultants and focuses on continuous integration pipelines, the fundamentals of the CI CD relationship, and GitOps basics. It also includes knowledge of workflows, incident response in platform engineering, and applying GitOps for application environments.

>> CNPA最新試験 <<

Linux FoundationのCNPA試験の最高の問題集

なにごとによらず初手は难しいです、どのようにLinux Foundation CNPA試験への復習を始めて悩んでいますか。我々のLinux Foundation CNPA問題集を購買するのはあなたの試験に準備する第一歩です。我々の提供するLinux Foundation CNPA問題集はあなたの需要に満足できるだけでなく、試験に合格する必要があることです。あなたはまだ躊躇しているなら、It-PassportsのCNPA問題集デモを参考しましょ。

Linux Foundation Certified Cloud Native Platform Engineering Associate 認定 CNPA 試験問題 (Q11-Q16):

質問 # 11
What is the main benefit of using minimal base container images and SBOM attestation practices in CI/CD pipelines?

A. Reducing the number of security vulnerabilities within container images.
B. Checking for duplicate libraries and that latest versions are being used.
C. Giving developers the maximum flexibility in what to include.
D. Reducing the size of container images and therefore storage costs.

正解：A

解説：
The use of minimal base container images and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) attestation is a best practice for strengthening software supply chain security. Option B is correct because smaller base images contain fewer components, which inherently reduces the attack surface and the number of potential vulnerabilities. SBOMs, meanwhile, provide a detailed inventory of included libraries and dependencies, enabling vulnerability scanning, license compliance, and traceability.
Option A is only a partial benefit, not the primary goal. Option C (maximum flexibility) contradicts the principle of minimal images, which deliberately restrict included software. Option D (reducing storage costs) may be a side effect but is not the core benefit in a security-focused context.
By combining minimal images with SBOM practices, platform teams ensure stronger compliance with supply chain security frameworks, enable early detection of vulnerabilities in CI/CD pipelines, and support fast remediation. This is emphasized in CNCF security and platform engineering guidance as a way to align with zero-trust principles.
References:- CNCF Supply Chain Security Whitepaper- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide

質問 # 12
Which of the following is a primary benefit of using Kubernetes Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs) in a self-service platform model?

A. CRDs provide built-in support for multi-cloud deployments without additional tooling.
B. CRDs enable platform teams to define custom APIs without modifying the Kubernetes API server code.
C. CRDs eliminate the need for Role-based access control (RBAC) configurations in Kubernetes clusters.
D. CRDs automatically manage the scaling and failover of platform services without additional configuration.

正解：B

解説：
Kubernetes Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs) extend the Kubernetes API by allowing platform teams to create and expose custom APIs without modifying the core Kubernetes API server code. Option C is correct because this extensibility enables teams to define new abstractions (e.g., Database, Application, or Environment resources) tailored to organizational needs, which developers can consume through a self- service model.
Option A is incorrect because scaling and failover are handled by controllers or operators, not CRDs themselves. Option B is wrong because RBAC is still required for access control over custom resources.
Option D is misleading because multi-cloud support depends on how CRDs and their controllers are implemented, not a built-in CRD feature.
By leveraging CRDs, platform teams can standardize workflows, hide complexity, and implement guardrails, all while presenting developers with simplified abstractions. This is central to platform engineering, as it empowers developers with self-service APIs while maintaining operational control.
References:- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Kubernetes Extensibility Documentation- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide

質問 # 13
Which tool is commonly used to automate environment provisioning?

A. Prometheus
B. Docker
C. Kubernetes
D. OpenTofu

正解：D

解説：
OpenTofu (the open-source fork of Terraform) is one of the most widely used tools for automating environment provisioning. Option D is correct because OpenTofu allows teams to define infrastructure as code, supporting multiple cloud providers and services. It enables declarative, reusable, and version- controlled provisioning workflows, ensuring consistency across environments.
Option A (Kubernetes) orchestrates containers and workloads but does not provision infrastructure outside its cluster scope. Option B (Prometheus) is an observability tool, not an IaC tool. Option C (Docker) manages containers but does not provision full environments or infrastructure.
By using tools like OpenTofu/Terraform, platform engineers ensure scalable, repeatable environment provisioning integrated into CI/CD or GitOps workflows. This aligns with platform engineering's goals of reducing toil and enabling self-service with compliance.
References:- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Infrastructure as Code Best Practices- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide

質問 # 14
In a GitOps setup, which of the following correctly describes the interaction between components when using a pull-based approach?

A. The git repository pushes configuration changes directly to the syncer without any checks.
B. The syncer uses webhooks to notify the target cluster of changes in the git repository.
C. The target cluster sends updates to the git repository whenever a change is made.
D. The syncer continuously checks the git repository for changes and applies them to the target cluster.

正解：D

解説：
GitOps uses a pull-based approach, where controllers inside the cluster continuously reconcile the desired state stored in Git with the actual cluster state. Option A is correct because GitOps sync agents (e.g., Argo CD, Flux) poll or watch Git repositories for changes and automatically apply updates to the cluster.
Option B reverses the model-clusters do not send updates to Git; Git is the source of truth. Option C is partially misleading: webhooks can trigger faster syncs but reconciliation is still pull-based. Option D misrepresents GitOps-Git never pushes directly to clusters.
This pull-based approach ensures greater security (clusters pull changes rather than exposing themselves to pushes), consistency (Git as source of truth), and continuous reconciliation (drift correction).
References:- CNCF GitOps Principles- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide

質問 # 15
A platform team wants to let developers provision cloud services like S3 buckets and databases using Kubernetes-native APIs, without exposing cloud-specific details. Which tool is best suited for this?

A. Helm
B. Crossplane
C. OpenTofu
D. Cluster API

正解：B

解説：
Crossplane is the CNCF project designed to extend Kubernetes with the ability to provision and manage cloud resources via Kubernetes-native APIs. Option B is correct because Crossplane lets developers use familiar Kubernetes manifests to request resources like S3 buckets, databases, or VPCs while abstracting provider-specific implementation details. Platform teams can define compositions and abstractions, providing developers with golden paths that include organizational guardrails.
Option A (Cluster API) is focused on provisioning Kubernetes clusters themselves, not cloud services. Option C (Helm) manages Kubernetes application deployments but does not provision external infrastructure. Option D (OpenTofu) is a Terraform fork that provides IaC but is not Kubernetes-native.
By leveraging Crossplane, platform teams achieve infrastructure as data and full GitOps integration, empowering developers to provision services declaratively while ensuring governance and compliance.
References:- CNCF Crossplane Project Documentation- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide

質問 # 16
......

Linux Foundation学習教材には、It-PassportsPDFバージョン、ソフトバージョン、APPバージョンのさまざまなバージョンがあります。コンピューターで勉強するのが好きでも、紙の資料を読むのが好きでも、CNPA学習資料はLinux Foundationあなたのニーズを満たすことができます。ほとんどの時間、紙の学習資料を読むことに慣れている場合は、心配を解消できます。 CNPA試験クイズでは、この分野の顧客のニーズを完全に考慮します。 CNPA学習教材のバージョンは、お客様がCertified Cloud Native Platform Engineering Associate学習できるようになっているため、自由時間が十分に活用され、知識を統合できることがよくあります。

CNPA再テスト: https://www.it-passports.com/CNPA.html

Tom Walker Tom Walker

Biography

CNPA最新試験 & CNPA再テスト

Linux Foundation CNPA 認定試験の出題範囲：

Linux FoundationのCNPA試験の最高の問題集

Linux Foundation Certified Cloud Native Platform Engineering Associate 認定 CNPA 試験問題 (Q11-Q16):

Liens rapides

Resources

Support